Who is the Real Crook?

Abuse of Authority

It is not only Police who can be guilty of the above noted criminal offence. Members of Parliament, especially Cabinet Ministers, can also be guilty of that charge.

We maintain that three prime ministers and three or more Crown Ministers are guilty of that charge. That came about by the simple act of creating the infamous Bill C 68 and then amending the Firearms Act and the Criminal Code and by causing the police forces of Canada to enforce what are illegal laws.

They are illegal because the authority to create laws pertaining to personal property are, in the BNA Act, the sole domain of the provincial legislatures. Ottawa never had the right to create laws pertaining to Personal Property (which includes firearms). They do have the right to create laws pertaining to serious crime. But they do not have the right or authority to create a new crime that applies to law-abiding citizens who refuse to register private property. Neither can they demand a registry or fee of people who drive on provincial roads or fishermen who fish in provincial water or hunters who hunt on provincial crown land or drillers who drill for mineral resources on provincial land.

Simply put, Stephen Harper and Stockwell Day, and their predecessors are all guilty of imposing regulations that derive from an illegal Act. By that same process all Members of Parliament who know this fact and do nothing to expose it are in default of their sworn oath to uphold the principle of law.

I doubt that anyone will even try to rebut this statement. The fact of the matter is not that two million gun owners are guilty of a criminal act but that 308 present Members of Parliament and an unknown number of ex-MPs are the real crooks because they fail(ed) to denounce a crime being committed by their peers.

Writing petitions and letters, holding protest meetings, wasting time and money in court appeals have so far produced nothing of consequence in having C 68 repealed. These actions by otherwise law-abiding paper criminals has had serious financial effects on the accused and appellants and a considerable waste of everybody’s dollars to pay the Crown employees and police to harass innocent people and to record the serial numbers on their private property in an illegal central registry.


If the passage and imposition of C 68 is an illegal act then it is time that those who created that Act and those who still impose its subsequent illegal Rules and Regulations be charged with abuse of authority in the same manner that would apply to an overbearing and intimidating police constable.

The Morning Glory Rebellion provides an economical and effective way to tell our overpaid bench warmers to quit supporting a serious abuse of authority. The need and necessity of maintaining law and order applies equally to all citizens but most especially to all who have sworn an oath to do so.