YOUR CHOICE
Now that the election has been called you have 30 days to decide what you are going to do. If you are truly happy with Harper’s handling of things over the last two and a half years, then vote for him, by all means. If you are UNHAPPY you must make a voting choice that will express your unhappiness. It is too late now to talk of joining the CPC and voice your opinion at the next local Association meeting.
Let’s talk choices, there are only five,
1) Vote for another major party candidate but first take a good hard look at Dion and Layton and what they can or will do for you,
2) Vote for all candidates, thus spoiling your ballot and tell them all that you are unhappy. This will not send a message to anyone.
3) Do not vote. This will send a message to no one because they will not know why you did not vote.
4) Park your vote with the Green Party Candidate - there will be one in all 308 Ridings. That will upset the results in at least 28 Ridings and will result in another minority CPC government. It will also be the eventual death knell to both Harper and Dion because they will quickly lose the support of their political party’s hierarchy. If the Greens do win a couple of seats as a result of a mass parking of votes they will have no influence in a parliament of any mixture.
5) Or vote for a Libertarian Candidate if one is running in your Riding. They will not likely win even one seat, but their rise in popularity will, like an increase in the Green Party’s success, be taken as a warning that the vox populi is indeed sending ‘them’ a serious warning. That warning is “Live up to the promises and commitments you made in 2006, or else!”
Whether your gripe has to do with income trusts, oil revenues, corporate welfare, gun control, race-based fisheries, judicial weakness, health care or favouritism to Quebec, only one of the above 5 choices is likely to see a noticeable improvement in the next few years. Harper faces an internal revolution in his party if he does not win a majority this time, and he won’t, and all the Liberals have to do is replace Dion with a more acceptable potential Prime Minister and they will win a subsequent election, hands down. History supports this prediction.
What is your choice?
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Monday, September 1, 2008
Fall Election?
Who is Abusing Whom?
Now we have our PM hinting at - threatening - preparing us for - a fall election. The excuse is given as “Because of the unco-operative opposition parties our minority government is dysfunctional therefore we will have an election, the CPC will win a majority, and we will once again become a functioning government”
The present government may be dysfunctional, but primarily because it has become a one man band – a Harper dictatorship without force and effect.
My opinion is, and I am not by any means alone in this, that Dion is weak, the Liberals are broke and a recession is building that will seriously increase the EI and welfare rolls in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes. If Obama wins in the States in November, it will be that much worse in Central Canada. Therefore, Harper will force the election now for no other reason than we may not get the majority we want ( read I want badly) but if the Liberals fire Dion (that is, he resigns) they may beat us next year. The sticking point in all of this is that Harper said, several months ago, words to the effect that, “The Americans have a financial problem building but we in Canada will not have a problem; or economy is strong”. If he waits too long his bragging will surely cost him dearly in the heartland of his support
Most importantly, the latest Polls show that a fall election will result in the same results as the last time or, for the Conservatives, slightly worse.
Harper’s response. ….Go to the polls now and pray like hell.
What has this got to do with Bill C 68 and the Morning Glory Rebellion?
There will never be a better opportunity to upset the Ottawa Apple Cart and show a united front that will cost many borderline Members of Parliament their jobs. We may even have the opportunity of having a pro-gun voice in Parliament. The cost will be only ten dollars a head when we gun-owners have already lost hundreds, if not thousands of dollars and stand to lose a lot more if a majority government is elected before we can get C 68 repealed.
And we gun-owners are not alone; there are lots of folks unhappy with the CPC.
Now we have our PM hinting at - threatening - preparing us for - a fall election. The excuse is given as “Because of the unco-operative opposition parties our minority government is dysfunctional therefore we will have an election, the CPC will win a majority, and we will once again become a functioning government”
The present government may be dysfunctional, but primarily because it has become a one man band – a Harper dictatorship without force and effect.
My opinion is, and I am not by any means alone in this, that Dion is weak, the Liberals are broke and a recession is building that will seriously increase the EI and welfare rolls in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes. If Obama wins in the States in November, it will be that much worse in Central Canada. Therefore, Harper will force the election now for no other reason than we may not get the majority we want ( read I want badly) but if the Liberals fire Dion (that is, he resigns) they may beat us next year. The sticking point in all of this is that Harper said, several months ago, words to the effect that, “The Americans have a financial problem building but we in Canada will not have a problem; or economy is strong”. If he waits too long his bragging will surely cost him dearly in the heartland of his support
Most importantly, the latest Polls show that a fall election will result in the same results as the last time or, for the Conservatives, slightly worse.
Harper’s response. ….Go to the polls now and pray like hell.
What has this got to do with Bill C 68 and the Morning Glory Rebellion?
There will never be a better opportunity to upset the Ottawa Apple Cart and show a united front that will cost many borderline Members of Parliament their jobs. We may even have the opportunity of having a pro-gun voice in Parliament. The cost will be only ten dollars a head when we gun-owners have already lost hundreds, if not thousands of dollars and stand to lose a lot more if a majority government is elected before we can get C 68 repealed.
And we gun-owners are not alone; there are lots of folks unhappy with the CPC.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
AN ALTERNATIVE
Libertarian or Green
Recent events have encouraged me to make a slight change in the method of achieving the Morning Glory Rebellion.
Because the Libertarian Party has come to life and have 41 candidates listed for the forthcoming Federal Election, I encourage citizens to vote Libertarian in Ridings where there is a candidate. Of course I would have long since recommended that we use the Libertarian Party of Canada as a vehicle to voice our protest against Stephan Harper had they offered a Candidate in every Riding, but they didn’t.
The Libertarian Party of Canada can be located at http://www.libertarian.ca where
all your questions will be answered. They list a total of 41 Candidates Canada wide, which is only 13% coverage. You are urged to consider this alternative, especially if you cannot be persuaded to vote Green.
Voting either way will achieve our aim to give a long overdue kick in the behind to the politicians of the three major parties. You may even like what the Libertarians stand for.
I do.
Recent events have encouraged me to make a slight change in the method of achieving the Morning Glory Rebellion.
Because the Libertarian Party has come to life and have 41 candidates listed for the forthcoming Federal Election, I encourage citizens to vote Libertarian in Ridings where there is a candidate. Of course I would have long since recommended that we use the Libertarian Party of Canada as a vehicle to voice our protest against Stephan Harper had they offered a Candidate in every Riding, but they didn’t.
The Libertarian Party of Canada can be located at http://www.libertarian.ca where
all your questions will be answered. They list a total of 41 Candidates Canada wide, which is only 13% coverage. You are urged to consider this alternative, especially if you cannot be persuaded to vote Green.
Voting either way will achieve our aim to give a long overdue kick in the behind to the politicians of the three major parties. You may even like what the Libertarians stand for.
I do.
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Tides
The Tide is Turning
I get the very strong impression that the tide for we gun owners is turning. And two events were no doubt both necessary to create the right atmospheric conditions for that to occur.
The American Supreme Court Ruling that gun ownership is an inherent right, and
Dave “Boo Boo” Miller’s unbelievable decision to follow Paul Martin into political oblivion by proposing a gun crime corrective action that is a) impossible to enforce, b) will not effect the guilty culprits and c) will cause the gang crime problem to escalate. Presumably he, like Hitler, also has a solution for the problem that he alone created. Ad infinitum! Ad nauseum! Ad Mortium!
The sudden increase in pro-gun activity and sentiment in Ontario is a response to Miller’s plan (A) and is welcomed by we westerners who have been much less inclined to cower in our foxholes these last dozen years. Could it be that thousands of Ontarians now realize that the OFAH proposals are huff and puff and ever so politically correct.
But, lads and lassies, the tide does not flow in forever, so if we are to launch our attack, let us get our war canoe into the deepening water at the first possible moment and bring our enemies to close grips.
I get the very strong impression that the tide for we gun owners is turning. And two events were no doubt both necessary to create the right atmospheric conditions for that to occur.
The American Supreme Court Ruling that gun ownership is an inherent right, and
Dave “Boo Boo” Miller’s unbelievable decision to follow Paul Martin into political oblivion by proposing a gun crime corrective action that is a) impossible to enforce, b) will not effect the guilty culprits and c) will cause the gang crime problem to escalate. Presumably he, like Hitler, also has a solution for the problem that he alone created. Ad infinitum! Ad nauseum! Ad Mortium!
The sudden increase in pro-gun activity and sentiment in Ontario is a response to Miller’s plan (A) and is welcomed by we westerners who have been much less inclined to cower in our foxholes these last dozen years. Could it be that thousands of Ontarians now realize that the OFAH proposals are huff and puff and ever so politically correct.
But, lads and lassies, the tide does not flow in forever, so if we are to launch our attack, let us get our war canoe into the deepening water at the first possible moment and bring our enemies to close grips.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
United Action
Willful Blindness is Suicide.
How many of the “X” million Canadian gun owners believe that the CPC, once (if) they achieve a majority at the polls will do one or more of the following?
A) Repeal C 68 in its entirety and re-negotiate, with the stakeholders (us) some form of gun (people) control.
B) Make a few minor changes to the present Firearms Act which will be “feel-good” measures and in no way hamper them, or future governments from confiscating some, or all firearms.
C) Make no changes, except to strengthen the control of the Nanny State over the serfs.
D) Whatever they do, they will hand over the mess for the renewed Liberals, who will win the subsequent election (as usual) and carry on where Paul Martin left off.
Now, before you put the question, review the following excerpt from an article by feature reporter Greg Thompson in the 1 July 2008 edition of the Kings County Record :
Para 6 (quote) “Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day says effective gun control requires high levels of compliance and these changes are designed to help that along” (unquote) [ The changes he refers to are the latest amnesty regulations].
Since the first amnesty regulations were invoked two years ago we have been proclaiming repeatedly that the amnesty changes were designed solely to increase the compliance percentage from the true 45% to something higher so that the UN Gin Grabbers could declare their plan to be an accomplished fact and therefore Canada is once again leading the civilized world into voluntary serfdom.
Anyone that believes, as does Doctor Mike Ackermann, our faithful representative on Stockwell Day’s so called Advisory Council, that we MUST vote Conservative at the next election as it is our only hope, are absolutely out to lunch. Perhaps Mike, being a Maritimer, suffers from that well-known Eastern “Party loyalty despite all contrary evidence” that has led them into many past election fiascos.
There are only two possible routes that we gun owners can follow. One is to listen to “No Logic Mike” and vote for the Harper/Day coalition (and then pray), or
Use our heads for a change, vote strategically so as to make our point by collective action, then use the next minority interregnum to talk some sense into the heads of all the Parliamentarians, and through them into the Ottawa bureaucracy.
A vote for the CPC will fullfill a death-wish for us, but eventually a gold mine for gun smugglers…..and they won’t be smuggling in duck guns and .22 target pistols.
We must first smarten up the Conservatives, THEN give them a majority.
How many of the “X” million Canadian gun owners believe that the CPC, once (if) they achieve a majority at the polls will do one or more of the following?
A) Repeal C 68 in its entirety and re-negotiate, with the stakeholders (us) some form of gun (people) control.
B) Make a few minor changes to the present Firearms Act which will be “feel-good” measures and in no way hamper them, or future governments from confiscating some, or all firearms.
C) Make no changes, except to strengthen the control of the Nanny State over the serfs.
D) Whatever they do, they will hand over the mess for the renewed Liberals, who will win the subsequent election (as usual) and carry on where Paul Martin left off.
Now, before you put the question, review the following excerpt from an article by feature reporter Greg Thompson in the 1 July 2008 edition of the Kings County Record :
Para 6 (quote) “Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day says effective gun control requires high levels of compliance and these changes are designed to help that along” (unquote) [ The changes he refers to are the latest amnesty regulations].
Since the first amnesty regulations were invoked two years ago we have been proclaiming repeatedly that the amnesty changes were designed solely to increase the compliance percentage from the true 45% to something higher so that the UN Gin Grabbers could declare their plan to be an accomplished fact and therefore Canada is once again leading the civilized world into voluntary serfdom.
Anyone that believes, as does Doctor Mike Ackermann, our faithful representative on Stockwell Day’s so called Advisory Council, that we MUST vote Conservative at the next election as it is our only hope, are absolutely out to lunch. Perhaps Mike, being a Maritimer, suffers from that well-known Eastern “Party loyalty despite all contrary evidence” that has led them into many past election fiascos.
There are only two possible routes that we gun owners can follow. One is to listen to “No Logic Mike” and vote for the Harper/Day coalition (and then pray), or
Use our heads for a change, vote strategically so as to make our point by collective action, then use the next minority interregnum to talk some sense into the heads of all the Parliamentarians, and through them into the Ottawa bureaucracy.
A vote for the CPC will fullfill a death-wish for us, but eventually a gold mine for gun smugglers…..and they won’t be smuggling in duck guns and .22 target pistols.
We must first smarten up the Conservatives, THEN give them a majority.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
LOGICAL ORDER
The Morning Glory Rebellion was conceived as the best method of getting the attention of our Parliamentarians and it was designed to be the simplest, most economical, secure and effective method of doing that.
What we did not explain, and should have, is the logic behind our selection of this priority. So here is our reasoning. We have four major problems in Canada which manifest themselves in the conception, implementation, application and persistence of Bill C-68 and the subsequent amendments to the Firearms Act.
These national problems as they affect C 68 and subsequent laws are:
1) Bill C 68 was conceived by parliamentarians (Chrétien and Rock) to win an election, not, as is claimed, to enhance public order. They achieved their aim by deceit and they thereby criminalized honest law-abiding people. This action is not what these men were elected to do. Their successors are little better.
2) The various police departments in the country varied greatly in their interpretation of these new laws depending on how they view their responsibility to the public, of which they often forget they are a part. Many truly believe they are the elites. This happened because the vast majority of police in Canada are only sworn to obey orders. The New Westminster Police of B.C. are an exception.
3) Our courts have applied their own interpretations to these new laws but their judgments tend, along with all others “in this new legal age” to punish the innocent while leaning only lightly on the criminal.
4) The many bureaucrats who support, and apply pressure to enforce the Firearms Act do so unsupervised by their Ministers, such as Stockwell Day, who don’t understand what they are doing but dare not offend their staff by offering firm directions. The tail therefore wags the dog. Life is easier that way.
So who controls what? The answer is simple. The parliament of this country should and can control the basic actions and directions of the other three, but over time they have abrogated that responsibility. Life for them is easier that way. It is not easier for the public body but the over-riding reason this all transpired is that we grew fat, lazy and, emulating our canine pets, fell asleep in the sun. We thought life was easier that way. Well the sun has sunk behind the rising cloud that warns of a major storm and great danger. We must not ignore the alarm bells because our children’s lives are risk.
The only action we can take in order to correct all four problems is Priority #1. We cannot redirect the courts. We cannot re-organize the police forces and we cannot “get at” our paid servants. Only Parliament can have any real effect on the other three. And the best way to achieve that goal is via the Morning Glory Rebellion.
If you believe otherwise, log on and state your case. If you agree then show your true colours by saying so and spreading the word.
What we did not explain, and should have, is the logic behind our selection of this priority. So here is our reasoning. We have four major problems in Canada which manifest themselves in the conception, implementation, application and persistence of Bill C-68 and the subsequent amendments to the Firearms Act.
These national problems as they affect C 68 and subsequent laws are:
1) Bill C 68 was conceived by parliamentarians (Chrétien and Rock) to win an election, not, as is claimed, to enhance public order. They achieved their aim by deceit and they thereby criminalized honest law-abiding people. This action is not what these men were elected to do. Their successors are little better.
2) The various police departments in the country varied greatly in their interpretation of these new laws depending on how they view their responsibility to the public, of which they often forget they are a part. Many truly believe they are the elites. This happened because the vast majority of police in Canada are only sworn to obey orders. The New Westminster Police of B.C. are an exception.
3) Our courts have applied their own interpretations to these new laws but their judgments tend, along with all others “in this new legal age” to punish the innocent while leaning only lightly on the criminal.
4) The many bureaucrats who support, and apply pressure to enforce the Firearms Act do so unsupervised by their Ministers, such as Stockwell Day, who don’t understand what they are doing but dare not offend their staff by offering firm directions. The tail therefore wags the dog. Life is easier that way.
So who controls what? The answer is simple. The parliament of this country should and can control the basic actions and directions of the other three, but over time they have abrogated that responsibility. Life for them is easier that way. It is not easier for the public body but the over-riding reason this all transpired is that we grew fat, lazy and, emulating our canine pets, fell asleep in the sun. We thought life was easier that way. Well the sun has sunk behind the rising cloud that warns of a major storm and great danger. We must not ignore the alarm bells because our children’s lives are risk.
The only action we can take in order to correct all four problems is Priority #1. We cannot redirect the courts. We cannot re-organize the police forces and we cannot “get at” our paid servants. Only Parliament can have any real effect on the other three. And the best way to achieve that goal is via the Morning Glory Rebellion.
If you believe otherwise, log on and state your case. If you agree then show your true colours by saying so and spreading the word.
Friday, June 6, 2008
AMENDMENT
The Winds of Change
No sooner had I written of my anxiety that Canadian men, especially in Central Canada, need a shot of Super Viagra to make them “stand up” than news from Ontario indicates that the fear of losing their guns has awakened a ten year dormant ground-swell of opposition to Dan Miller and his limp-wristed cohorts.
This is good. This is more than good because there never has been much doubt that many Westerners were going to defy C 68 right to the wall – and beyond if necessary. There may be more than a token resistance movement in the Maritimes but our lousy western news media think the Canada ends at the Kagnawaga Indian Reserve and seldom report on anything east of there unless it has to do with killing seals or the sexual activities (or speculation thereon) of various useless Ottawa bench-warmers.
We heartily applaud the efforts of Ontario gun owners to resist the efforts of Dan Miller (shades of expired chicken farmer Heinrich Himmler) to render a million grown men in the GTA into eunuchs or castrato tenors with one swift stroke of a sharp knife.
Power to the people. Down with dictators. Forward the Morning Glory Rebellion.
No sooner had I written of my anxiety that Canadian men, especially in Central Canada, need a shot of Super Viagra to make them “stand up” than news from Ontario indicates that the fear of losing their guns has awakened a ten year dormant ground-swell of opposition to Dan Miller and his limp-wristed cohorts.
This is good. This is more than good because there never has been much doubt that many Westerners were going to defy C 68 right to the wall – and beyond if necessary. There may be more than a token resistance movement in the Maritimes but our lousy western news media think the Canada ends at the Kagnawaga Indian Reserve and seldom report on anything east of there unless it has to do with killing seals or the sexual activities (or speculation thereon) of various useless Ottawa bench-warmers.
We heartily applaud the efforts of Ontario gun owners to resist the efforts of Dan Miller (shades of expired chicken farmer Heinrich Himmler) to render a million grown men in the GTA into eunuchs or castrato tenors with one swift stroke of a sharp knife.
Power to the people. Down with dictators. Forward the Morning Glory Rebellion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)