Libertarian or Green
Recent events have encouraged me to make a slight change in the method of achieving the Morning Glory Rebellion.
Because the Libertarian Party has come to life and have 41 candidates listed for the forthcoming Federal Election, I encourage citizens to vote Libertarian in Ridings where there is a candidate. Of course I would have long since recommended that we use the Libertarian Party of Canada as a vehicle to voice our protest against Stephan Harper had they offered a Candidate in every Riding, but they didn’t.
The Libertarian Party of Canada can be located at http://www.libertarian.ca where
all your questions will be answered. They list a total of 41 Candidates Canada wide, which is only 13% coverage. You are urged to consider this alternative, especially if you cannot be persuaded to vote Green.
Voting either way will achieve our aim to give a long overdue kick in the behind to the politicians of the three major parties. You may even like what the Libertarians stand for.
I do.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Tides
The Tide is Turning
I get the very strong impression that the tide for we gun owners is turning. And two events were no doubt both necessary to create the right atmospheric conditions for that to occur.
The American Supreme Court Ruling that gun ownership is an inherent right, and
Dave “Boo Boo” Miller’s unbelievable decision to follow Paul Martin into political oblivion by proposing a gun crime corrective action that is a) impossible to enforce, b) will not effect the guilty culprits and c) will cause the gang crime problem to escalate. Presumably he, like Hitler, also has a solution for the problem that he alone created. Ad infinitum! Ad nauseum! Ad Mortium!
The sudden increase in pro-gun activity and sentiment in Ontario is a response to Miller’s plan (A) and is welcomed by we westerners who have been much less inclined to cower in our foxholes these last dozen years. Could it be that thousands of Ontarians now realize that the OFAH proposals are huff and puff and ever so politically correct.
But, lads and lassies, the tide does not flow in forever, so if we are to launch our attack, let us get our war canoe into the deepening water at the first possible moment and bring our enemies to close grips.
I get the very strong impression that the tide for we gun owners is turning. And two events were no doubt both necessary to create the right atmospheric conditions for that to occur.
The American Supreme Court Ruling that gun ownership is an inherent right, and
Dave “Boo Boo” Miller’s unbelievable decision to follow Paul Martin into political oblivion by proposing a gun crime corrective action that is a) impossible to enforce, b) will not effect the guilty culprits and c) will cause the gang crime problem to escalate. Presumably he, like Hitler, also has a solution for the problem that he alone created. Ad infinitum! Ad nauseum! Ad Mortium!
The sudden increase in pro-gun activity and sentiment in Ontario is a response to Miller’s plan (A) and is welcomed by we westerners who have been much less inclined to cower in our foxholes these last dozen years. Could it be that thousands of Ontarians now realize that the OFAH proposals are huff and puff and ever so politically correct.
But, lads and lassies, the tide does not flow in forever, so if we are to launch our attack, let us get our war canoe into the deepening water at the first possible moment and bring our enemies to close grips.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
United Action
Willful Blindness is Suicide.
How many of the “X” million Canadian gun owners believe that the CPC, once (if) they achieve a majority at the polls will do one or more of the following?
A) Repeal C 68 in its entirety and re-negotiate, with the stakeholders (us) some form of gun (people) control.
B) Make a few minor changes to the present Firearms Act which will be “feel-good” measures and in no way hamper them, or future governments from confiscating some, or all firearms.
C) Make no changes, except to strengthen the control of the Nanny State over the serfs.
D) Whatever they do, they will hand over the mess for the renewed Liberals, who will win the subsequent election (as usual) and carry on where Paul Martin left off.
Now, before you put the question, review the following excerpt from an article by feature reporter Greg Thompson in the 1 July 2008 edition of the Kings County Record :
Para 6 (quote) “Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day says effective gun control requires high levels of compliance and these changes are designed to help that along” (unquote) [ The changes he refers to are the latest amnesty regulations].
Since the first amnesty regulations were invoked two years ago we have been proclaiming repeatedly that the amnesty changes were designed solely to increase the compliance percentage from the true 45% to something higher so that the UN Gin Grabbers could declare their plan to be an accomplished fact and therefore Canada is once again leading the civilized world into voluntary serfdom.
Anyone that believes, as does Doctor Mike Ackermann, our faithful representative on Stockwell Day’s so called Advisory Council, that we MUST vote Conservative at the next election as it is our only hope, are absolutely out to lunch. Perhaps Mike, being a Maritimer, suffers from that well-known Eastern “Party loyalty despite all contrary evidence” that has led them into many past election fiascos.
There are only two possible routes that we gun owners can follow. One is to listen to “No Logic Mike” and vote for the Harper/Day coalition (and then pray), or
Use our heads for a change, vote strategically so as to make our point by collective action, then use the next minority interregnum to talk some sense into the heads of all the Parliamentarians, and through them into the Ottawa bureaucracy.
A vote for the CPC will fullfill a death-wish for us, but eventually a gold mine for gun smugglers…..and they won’t be smuggling in duck guns and .22 target pistols.
We must first smarten up the Conservatives, THEN give them a majority.
How many of the “X” million Canadian gun owners believe that the CPC, once (if) they achieve a majority at the polls will do one or more of the following?
A) Repeal C 68 in its entirety and re-negotiate, with the stakeholders (us) some form of gun (people) control.
B) Make a few minor changes to the present Firearms Act which will be “feel-good” measures and in no way hamper them, or future governments from confiscating some, or all firearms.
C) Make no changes, except to strengthen the control of the Nanny State over the serfs.
D) Whatever they do, they will hand over the mess for the renewed Liberals, who will win the subsequent election (as usual) and carry on where Paul Martin left off.
Now, before you put the question, review the following excerpt from an article by feature reporter Greg Thompson in the 1 July 2008 edition of the Kings County Record :
Para 6 (quote) “Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day says effective gun control requires high levels of compliance and these changes are designed to help that along” (unquote) [ The changes he refers to are the latest amnesty regulations].
Since the first amnesty regulations were invoked two years ago we have been proclaiming repeatedly that the amnesty changes were designed solely to increase the compliance percentage from the true 45% to something higher so that the UN Gin Grabbers could declare their plan to be an accomplished fact and therefore Canada is once again leading the civilized world into voluntary serfdom.
Anyone that believes, as does Doctor Mike Ackermann, our faithful representative on Stockwell Day’s so called Advisory Council, that we MUST vote Conservative at the next election as it is our only hope, are absolutely out to lunch. Perhaps Mike, being a Maritimer, suffers from that well-known Eastern “Party loyalty despite all contrary evidence” that has led them into many past election fiascos.
There are only two possible routes that we gun owners can follow. One is to listen to “No Logic Mike” and vote for the Harper/Day coalition (and then pray), or
Use our heads for a change, vote strategically so as to make our point by collective action, then use the next minority interregnum to talk some sense into the heads of all the Parliamentarians, and through them into the Ottawa bureaucracy.
A vote for the CPC will fullfill a death-wish for us, but eventually a gold mine for gun smugglers…..and they won’t be smuggling in duck guns and .22 target pistols.
We must first smarten up the Conservatives, THEN give them a majority.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
LOGICAL ORDER
The Morning Glory Rebellion was conceived as the best method of getting the attention of our Parliamentarians and it was designed to be the simplest, most economical, secure and effective method of doing that.
What we did not explain, and should have, is the logic behind our selection of this priority. So here is our reasoning. We have four major problems in Canada which manifest themselves in the conception, implementation, application and persistence of Bill C-68 and the subsequent amendments to the Firearms Act.
These national problems as they affect C 68 and subsequent laws are:
1) Bill C 68 was conceived by parliamentarians (Chrétien and Rock) to win an election, not, as is claimed, to enhance public order. They achieved their aim by deceit and they thereby criminalized honest law-abiding people. This action is not what these men were elected to do. Their successors are little better.
2) The various police departments in the country varied greatly in their interpretation of these new laws depending on how they view their responsibility to the public, of which they often forget they are a part. Many truly believe they are the elites. This happened because the vast majority of police in Canada are only sworn to obey orders. The New Westminster Police of B.C. are an exception.
3) Our courts have applied their own interpretations to these new laws but their judgments tend, along with all others “in this new legal age” to punish the innocent while leaning only lightly on the criminal.
4) The many bureaucrats who support, and apply pressure to enforce the Firearms Act do so unsupervised by their Ministers, such as Stockwell Day, who don’t understand what they are doing but dare not offend their staff by offering firm directions. The tail therefore wags the dog. Life is easier that way.
So who controls what? The answer is simple. The parliament of this country should and can control the basic actions and directions of the other three, but over time they have abrogated that responsibility. Life for them is easier that way. It is not easier for the public body but the over-riding reason this all transpired is that we grew fat, lazy and, emulating our canine pets, fell asleep in the sun. We thought life was easier that way. Well the sun has sunk behind the rising cloud that warns of a major storm and great danger. We must not ignore the alarm bells because our children’s lives are risk.
The only action we can take in order to correct all four problems is Priority #1. We cannot redirect the courts. We cannot re-organize the police forces and we cannot “get at” our paid servants. Only Parliament can have any real effect on the other three. And the best way to achieve that goal is via the Morning Glory Rebellion.
If you believe otherwise, log on and state your case. If you agree then show your true colours by saying so and spreading the word.
What we did not explain, and should have, is the logic behind our selection of this priority. So here is our reasoning. We have four major problems in Canada which manifest themselves in the conception, implementation, application and persistence of Bill C-68 and the subsequent amendments to the Firearms Act.
These national problems as they affect C 68 and subsequent laws are:
1) Bill C 68 was conceived by parliamentarians (Chrétien and Rock) to win an election, not, as is claimed, to enhance public order. They achieved their aim by deceit and they thereby criminalized honest law-abiding people. This action is not what these men were elected to do. Their successors are little better.
2) The various police departments in the country varied greatly in their interpretation of these new laws depending on how they view their responsibility to the public, of which they often forget they are a part. Many truly believe they are the elites. This happened because the vast majority of police in Canada are only sworn to obey orders. The New Westminster Police of B.C. are an exception.
3) Our courts have applied their own interpretations to these new laws but their judgments tend, along with all others “in this new legal age” to punish the innocent while leaning only lightly on the criminal.
4) The many bureaucrats who support, and apply pressure to enforce the Firearms Act do so unsupervised by their Ministers, such as Stockwell Day, who don’t understand what they are doing but dare not offend their staff by offering firm directions. The tail therefore wags the dog. Life is easier that way.
So who controls what? The answer is simple. The parliament of this country should and can control the basic actions and directions of the other three, but over time they have abrogated that responsibility. Life for them is easier that way. It is not easier for the public body but the over-riding reason this all transpired is that we grew fat, lazy and, emulating our canine pets, fell asleep in the sun. We thought life was easier that way. Well the sun has sunk behind the rising cloud that warns of a major storm and great danger. We must not ignore the alarm bells because our children’s lives are risk.
The only action we can take in order to correct all four problems is Priority #1. We cannot redirect the courts. We cannot re-organize the police forces and we cannot “get at” our paid servants. Only Parliament can have any real effect on the other three. And the best way to achieve that goal is via the Morning Glory Rebellion.
If you believe otherwise, log on and state your case. If you agree then show your true colours by saying so and spreading the word.
Friday, June 6, 2008
AMENDMENT
The Winds of Change
No sooner had I written of my anxiety that Canadian men, especially in Central Canada, need a shot of Super Viagra to make them “stand up” than news from Ontario indicates that the fear of losing their guns has awakened a ten year dormant ground-swell of opposition to Dan Miller and his limp-wristed cohorts.
This is good. This is more than good because there never has been much doubt that many Westerners were going to defy C 68 right to the wall – and beyond if necessary. There may be more than a token resistance movement in the Maritimes but our lousy western news media think the Canada ends at the Kagnawaga Indian Reserve and seldom report on anything east of there unless it has to do with killing seals or the sexual activities (or speculation thereon) of various useless Ottawa bench-warmers.
We heartily applaud the efforts of Ontario gun owners to resist the efforts of Dan Miller (shades of expired chicken farmer Heinrich Himmler) to render a million grown men in the GTA into eunuchs or castrato tenors with one swift stroke of a sharp knife.
Power to the people. Down with dictators. Forward the Morning Glory Rebellion.
No sooner had I written of my anxiety that Canadian men, especially in Central Canada, need a shot of Super Viagra to make them “stand up” than news from Ontario indicates that the fear of losing their guns has awakened a ten year dormant ground-swell of opposition to Dan Miller and his limp-wristed cohorts.
This is good. This is more than good because there never has been much doubt that many Westerners were going to defy C 68 right to the wall – and beyond if necessary. There may be more than a token resistance movement in the Maritimes but our lousy western news media think the Canada ends at the Kagnawaga Indian Reserve and seldom report on anything east of there unless it has to do with killing seals or the sexual activities (or speculation thereon) of various useless Ottawa bench-warmers.
We heartily applaud the efforts of Ontario gun owners to resist the efforts of Dan Miller (shades of expired chicken farmer Heinrich Himmler) to render a million grown men in the GTA into eunuchs or castrato tenors with one swift stroke of a sharp knife.
Power to the people. Down with dictators. Forward the Morning Glory Rebellion.
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Canadian Men Have a Secret Problem
Erectile Dysfunction – A National Problem
Our problem is not one of sexual dysfunction but rather that we cannot seem to get enough non-criminal gun owners to STAND ERECT and oppose C 68 – all of it. This is especially true in Ontario and Quebec. There are a large group of gun-owning men who can only, in this context, be described as flaccid, limp, inoperative – certainly non assertive.
But such a masculine mass must surely be capable of arousal! Perhaps the inevitable realization that they are about to lose their firearms – their precious phallic symbols, might stir them into action. They might become men again and take pride in that. But they might just be too late.
If “standing Erect” cannot be achieved soon enough then we can all join hands with European men and daily face towards our capital cities and demonstrate our submissiveness. There has occurred in Europe a mental castration that is unique in history. Perhaps the killing of such a high percentage of healthy males during two world wars has had an irreversible impact on the gene pool. Maybe they have become so overwhelmed by ‘beta bucks’ that the occasional ‘alpha buck’ cannot alone correct the decline in masculinity.
I have no explanation for Sweden – they did not participate in either war (a few joined German S.S. Viking Divisions in WW 2) but they nonetheless seem to be extremely docile and submissive to their (female) bureaucratic dictatorship.
My only comment on British men is “Lord God, what happened?”
Holland can be summed up in the recent speech given by their Prime Minister. In response to threats made by the ever bolder Muslim immigrant minority he said, “We should be kind to the Muslims, then, when they become the majority they will be kind to us”. I have never heard of such a limp invitation to rape, plunder and decimation.
We definitely need a massive international shot of Viagra II.
Our problem is not one of sexual dysfunction but rather that we cannot seem to get enough non-criminal gun owners to STAND ERECT and oppose C 68 – all of it. This is especially true in Ontario and Quebec. There are a large group of gun-owning men who can only, in this context, be described as flaccid, limp, inoperative – certainly non assertive.
But such a masculine mass must surely be capable of arousal! Perhaps the inevitable realization that they are about to lose their firearms – their precious phallic symbols, might stir them into action. They might become men again and take pride in that. But they might just be too late.
If “standing Erect” cannot be achieved soon enough then we can all join hands with European men and daily face towards our capital cities and demonstrate our submissiveness. There has occurred in Europe a mental castration that is unique in history. Perhaps the killing of such a high percentage of healthy males during two world wars has had an irreversible impact on the gene pool. Maybe they have become so overwhelmed by ‘beta bucks’ that the occasional ‘alpha buck’ cannot alone correct the decline in masculinity.
I have no explanation for Sweden – they did not participate in either war (a few joined German S.S. Viking Divisions in WW 2) but they nonetheless seem to be extremely docile and submissive to their (female) bureaucratic dictatorship.
My only comment on British men is “Lord God, what happened?”
Holland can be summed up in the recent speech given by their Prime Minister. In response to threats made by the ever bolder Muslim immigrant minority he said, “We should be kind to the Muslims, then, when they become the majority they will be kind to us”. I have never heard of such a limp invitation to rape, plunder and decimation.
We definitely need a massive international shot of Viagra II.
Friday, May 9, 2008
Five Years – 10 Years Slammer? Bullshit & Intimidation!
Twelve years ago, when the Chrétien / Rock attempt at a dictatorial ultimatum was being waved under our noses, the threat of five to ten years of jail time for even the smallest of paper infractions scared the bejesus out of many otherwise upstanding men of this country. Men were frantically burying guns in the back yard and swearing their wives and children to secrecy. Or they went, cap in hand to the local cop shop to confess their sinful ways, beg forgiveness and, to absolve themselves, pay a small Catholic-like tithe to the Holy Church of Righteousness in Ottawa.
At the time a few of us, and precious few, were strongly urging our fellow gun owners to stand fast. This was based on the obvious fact, at least to us, that we did not have enough court-rooms, enough judges, enough cops, and most importantly enough bureaucratic will power to enforce the order. It flew in the face of the First military rule of Discipline, which states, “Never issue an unpopular order unless you are both willing and able to enforce it.” When our government had neither the will nor the ability to enforce C 68, it was obviously a hollow threat. Any semi-organized resistance to C 68 would reduce it to a laughable paper tiger. So we pleaded, mostly unheeded.
Now, these many years later there has been precious few who have even seen the inside of a jail cell, if a trial actually took place. They number less than ten. With a probable figure of three million people being non-compliant my point has been made. One incarceration out of 333.000 cannot strike terror into the hearts of men.The only person who has suffered a serious sentencing penalty is Bruce Montague, who asked for it. And realize this, he received only the absolute minimum that Judge Wright could get away with without having his action appealed by the Ontario Government. However saint-like Bruce and Donna appear to their many supporters, and I am one, Bruce is still the lone exception that proves my point. He could have been awarded at least ten years, according to C 68 and an appeal would have had little chance. He was found guilty of many charges by a jury of peers and pistols without serial numbers are not quite the same as a few .22 shells in the glove compartment.
Now the remaining millions who trembled at Allan Rock’s threat so many years ago are surely coming to realize that they had shrunk back in fear from a yappy little lap dog. All they had to do was to stand still, upright, and suggest that “Fido” should “Shut the hell up and go to your corner”. Are they now ashamed at their timidity? I hope so. But they can rejoin the ranks of the Canadian men with balls by doing something positive to encourage our equally gutless politicos to heave C 68 in the trash can where it belongs.
Now, let us first remember that C 68 was a strictly political move invented to upstage that twit Kim Campbell’s silly suggestions that the Conservative Government, if elected, and in the so-called interest of improving public safety, would impose some minor aggravating rules on the gun-owning public. It was a politically clever move by Chrétien & Company but that is all it was intended to achieve – an election win. I am sure it was to the total astonishment of the Liberals that “We shut the hell up and went to OUR corners”. That, of course, encouraged “Fido” to rush forward, yapping and snarling and he has been doing so ever since.
It should also be remembered that C 68 was a usurpation of provincial jurisdiction, and still is, if our gutless provincial politicians would start fighting for us and not against us.
Letters, petitions, appeals and threats have achieved nothing. The courts are immune from criticism and many judges still do not know the difference between “anointed” and “appointed”. Many of our police constables, national, provincial and municipal, are sucked in by their own propaganda and encouraged by a logically challenged bleeding heart public into believing that they can be a one-man judge and jury with a badge and a gun and don’t forget the Tazer, that kiddy gun that does not cause bleeding and stuff. That looks bad on TV. Our military also gives their people guns but they discipline the soldiers’ brains first.
The only people, and there are 308 of them, that can really do anything about C 68 are our Members of Parliament. They are a weak-willed bunch of bench warmers and must be made fearful of losing their cushy lifestyle and obscene and unearned financial rewards. This can only happen if we, the long-suffering gun owners, make them afraid for their bulging purses.
If every gun owner in the country votes GREEN at the next election the Greens might win fifteen seats. Is this really something to fear? We have been putting up with about fifty low-life separatists for the last umpteen years who have been alternating between threats to destroy our nation and sucking as much blood as they can get. The only constant thing they can claim is that they are in favour of gun control (people control).
But we won’t be able to stiffen the spine of three million cringing ‘law abiders’ so let us settle for 5000 per Riding. That is about half. By my calculations of a year ago the outcome in about 30 seats would be unpredictable. Given that there are 3 top contenders for each of these seats we will make 90 politicians and wanabees very, very nervous. And if you do not think that 90 nervous nellies, with their eyes on a hundred and seventy grand a year won’t make some noise on behalf of stability, you are truly uninformed about politics.
On the opposite side of the unpredictable coin, a mixture of thirty (more or less) Liberals, Conservatives or “closet communists” will not change the situation in Ottawa. What will change is that both Harper and Dion will be gone for failing to bring in a majority and all politicians, federal and otherwise will now fully recognize what serious “block voting” means. Hell, the frenchies, Chinese, native Indians, Sikhs and all other minority tribes have been doing it for years. Or should I say have been doing it TO US for years.
Let’s get on top for a change. Join hands, fire a bunch of MPs – the rest will listen!
Twelve years ago, when the Chrétien / Rock attempt at a dictatorial ultimatum was being waved under our noses, the threat of five to ten years of jail time for even the smallest of paper infractions scared the bejesus out of many otherwise upstanding men of this country. Men were frantically burying guns in the back yard and swearing their wives and children to secrecy. Or they went, cap in hand to the local cop shop to confess their sinful ways, beg forgiveness and, to absolve themselves, pay a small Catholic-like tithe to the Holy Church of Righteousness in Ottawa.
At the time a few of us, and precious few, were strongly urging our fellow gun owners to stand fast. This was based on the obvious fact, at least to us, that we did not have enough court-rooms, enough judges, enough cops, and most importantly enough bureaucratic will power to enforce the order. It flew in the face of the First military rule of Discipline, which states, “Never issue an unpopular order unless you are both willing and able to enforce it.” When our government had neither the will nor the ability to enforce C 68, it was obviously a hollow threat. Any semi-organized resistance to C 68 would reduce it to a laughable paper tiger. So we pleaded, mostly unheeded.
Now, these many years later there has been precious few who have even seen the inside of a jail cell, if a trial actually took place. They number less than ten. With a probable figure of three million people being non-compliant my point has been made. One incarceration out of 333.000 cannot strike terror into the hearts of men.The only person who has suffered a serious sentencing penalty is Bruce Montague, who asked for it. And realize this, he received only the absolute minimum that Judge Wright could get away with without having his action appealed by the Ontario Government. However saint-like Bruce and Donna appear to their many supporters, and I am one, Bruce is still the lone exception that proves my point. He could have been awarded at least ten years, according to C 68 and an appeal would have had little chance. He was found guilty of many charges by a jury of peers and pistols without serial numbers are not quite the same as a few .22 shells in the glove compartment.
Now the remaining millions who trembled at Allan Rock’s threat so many years ago are surely coming to realize that they had shrunk back in fear from a yappy little lap dog. All they had to do was to stand still, upright, and suggest that “Fido” should “Shut the hell up and go to your corner”. Are they now ashamed at their timidity? I hope so. But they can rejoin the ranks of the Canadian men with balls by doing something positive to encourage our equally gutless politicos to heave C 68 in the trash can where it belongs.
Now, let us first remember that C 68 was a strictly political move invented to upstage that twit Kim Campbell’s silly suggestions that the Conservative Government, if elected, and in the so-called interest of improving public safety, would impose some minor aggravating rules on the gun-owning public. It was a politically clever move by Chrétien & Company but that is all it was intended to achieve – an election win. I am sure it was to the total astonishment of the Liberals that “We shut the hell up and went to OUR corners”. That, of course, encouraged “Fido” to rush forward, yapping and snarling and he has been doing so ever since.
It should also be remembered that C 68 was a usurpation of provincial jurisdiction, and still is, if our gutless provincial politicians would start fighting for us and not against us.
Letters, petitions, appeals and threats have achieved nothing. The courts are immune from criticism and many judges still do not know the difference between “anointed” and “appointed”. Many of our police constables, national, provincial and municipal, are sucked in by their own propaganda and encouraged by a logically challenged bleeding heart public into believing that they can be a one-man judge and jury with a badge and a gun and don’t forget the Tazer, that kiddy gun that does not cause bleeding and stuff. That looks bad on TV. Our military also gives their people guns but they discipline the soldiers’ brains first.
The only people, and there are 308 of them, that can really do anything about C 68 are our Members of Parliament. They are a weak-willed bunch of bench warmers and must be made fearful of losing their cushy lifestyle and obscene and unearned financial rewards. This can only happen if we, the long-suffering gun owners, make them afraid for their bulging purses.
If every gun owner in the country votes GREEN at the next election the Greens might win fifteen seats. Is this really something to fear? We have been putting up with about fifty low-life separatists for the last umpteen years who have been alternating between threats to destroy our nation and sucking as much blood as they can get. The only constant thing they can claim is that they are in favour of gun control (people control).
But we won’t be able to stiffen the spine of three million cringing ‘law abiders’ so let us settle for 5000 per Riding. That is about half. By my calculations of a year ago the outcome in about 30 seats would be unpredictable. Given that there are 3 top contenders for each of these seats we will make 90 politicians and wanabees very, very nervous. And if you do not think that 90 nervous nellies, with their eyes on a hundred and seventy grand a year won’t make some noise on behalf of stability, you are truly uninformed about politics.
On the opposite side of the unpredictable coin, a mixture of thirty (more or less) Liberals, Conservatives or “closet communists” will not change the situation in Ottawa. What will change is that both Harper and Dion will be gone for failing to bring in a majority and all politicians, federal and otherwise will now fully recognize what serious “block voting” means. Hell, the frenchies, Chinese, native Indians, Sikhs and all other minority tribes have been doing it for years. Or should I say have been doing it TO US for years.
Let’s get on top for a change. Join hands, fire a bunch of MPs – the rest will listen!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)